Performance Evaluation of Adsorbent Leca- Modified (TiO2/LECA) for the Removal of Anionic Surfactants from Wastewater

Authors

  • Mohammad Malakootian1 1- Environmental Health Engineering Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
  • Kamyar Yaghmaeian2 2- Dept. of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Rasoul Momenzadeh3 3- Dept. of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22100/jkh.v11i1.1093

Keywords:

Anionic surfactants, Absorbents leca, Titanium dioxide, Wastewater

Abstract

Introduction: Surfactants or surface active agents are organic chemicals that accumulate at the interface gas-liquid or liquid Wax, change the properties of water by reducing the surface tension of water, they speed up the cleaning process. Direct discharge of raw sewage or treated effluent, detergents into the environment and pollution, water resources and rising costs are reduced in quality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of Leca-containing titanium dioxide nanoparticles for the removal of the surfactant from wastewater.

Methods: This study is an experiment one at which batch experiments were performed using a Photocatalytic reactor. To study the preparation and properties of catalytic adsorbent Leca to increase the efficiency of titanium dioxide (Tio2) was used. Parameters (3, 5, 7, 9, 11) pH, amount of adsorbent (0.25-2 g/L), surfactant concentration (25-200 mg/L) and contact time (15-120 min) was evaluated by Leca- corrective Adsorbent. Experiments on synthetic examples and in optimal conditions, on real samples were also performed. Surfactant concentration is measured with a spectrophotometer model (shimadzu UV-1800) was performed at a wavelength nm467.

Results: The maximum removal of surfactant through Leca- modified in aqueous solutions of synthetic SDS in optimal conditions (contact time 30 min, pH =5, the value of 1 g/L of adsorbent and initial concentration of surfactant is 100 mg/L) at a rate of 98% in the same samples the actual result was 87%. The process of adsorption followed second-order kinetic model and the adsorption isotherm data (R2 =0.984) was more consistent.

Conclusion: The results showed that the Leca-containing nanoparticles of titanium dioxide can be used as an effective adsorbent for the removal of anionic surfactants from aqueous solutions used.

References

Dehghani MH, Nasseri S, Ghaderpoori M, Mahvi AH, Nabizadeh R. Investigating the efficiency of UV/H2O2 process for removal of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in aqueous solution. Iran J Health & Environ 2011;3:411-8.

Vaezi F, Bazrafshan E. Ultraviolet irradiation and its use for water and wastewater disinfection and treatment. Tehran: Andishmand pub;2008.[Persian].

Abedini A, Vahedi F, Khodaoarast SH, Babaei H. A survey on detergent concentration (ALS) in southern Caspian sea. Iranian Journal Scientific Fisheries 2006;15:101-7.[Persian].

Ebrahimi A, Ehrampoosh MH, Samaie MR, Ghelmani V, Talebi V, Dehghan M, et al. Removal efficiency of linear alkyl benzene sulfonate (las) in Yazd stabilization pond. Journal Wastewater 2011;4:38-43.[Persian].

Guang Guo Y. Behavior and effects of surfactants and their degradation products in the environment. International Journal Environment 2004;32:417-31.

Ayranci E, Duman O. Removal of anionic surfactants from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto high area activated carbon cloth studied by in situ UV spectroscopy. Journal of Hazardous Material 2007;148:75-82.

Tugba Olmez-Hanci, IdilArslan-Alaton, Gulcan Basar. Multivariate analysis of anionic, cationic and nonionic textile surfactant degradation with the H2O2/UV-Process by using the capabilities of response surface methodology. Journal Hazardous Materials 2010;148:430-70.

Noori R, Ayati B, Ganjidoust H. Investigation of surfactant removal using moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Environmental Sciences.2008;5:123-34.

Kowalska I. Surfactant removal from water solutions by means of ultra-filtration and ion exchange. Desalination 2008; 221:351-7.

Visa M, Duta A. TiO2/fly ash novel substrate for simultaneous removal of heavy metals and surfactants. Journal Chemical Engineering 2013;223:860-68.

Mortazavi SB, Khavanin A, Moussavi G, Azhdarpoor A. Removal of sodium dodecyl sulfate in an intermittent cycle extended aeration system. Pakistan Journal Biological Sciences 2008;11:290-93.[Persian].

Tayade RJ, Ramchandra GK, Raksh VJ. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2-coated NaY and HY zeolites for the degradation of methylene blue in water. Ind Eng Chem Res 2007;46:369-76.

Amirianshoja T, Junin R, Idris AK, Rahmani O. A comparative study of surfactant adsorption by clay minerals. Journal Petroleum Science and Engineering 2013;101:21-7.

Borghei M, Hasny H, Yazdanbakhsh AH, Shahngyan M. The efficiency of natural sinks (fruits and pine charcoal, soil, kaolinite, Sawdust and charcoal, activated carbon and sawdust) to remove the detergent. Environmental Science and Technology 2009;11:1-9.[Persian].

Li P, Miser DE, Rabiei S, Yadav RT, Hajaligol MR. The removal of carbon monoxide by iron oxide nanoparticles. Appl Catal B-Environ 2003;43:151-62.

Adak A, Bandyopadhyay M, Pal A. Removal of anionic surfactant from wastewater by alumina: A case study. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2005;254:165-7.

Clesceri Lenore S, Greenberg AE, Eaton Andrew D. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Baltimore: United Book Press Inc;1998.

Guptas pal A, kumar Ghosh P, Bandyopadhyay M. Performance of waste activated carbon as a low-cost adsorbent for the removal of anionic from aquatic environment. Journal Environment Science 2003;38:381-97.

Wilkin RT, Su C, Ford RG, Paul CJ. Chromium-removal processes during groundwater remediation by a zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier. Journal of Environment Science Technology 2005;39:599-605.

del Carmen M, Soriano H, Degryse F, Smolders E. Mechanisms of enhanced mobilization of trace metals by anionic surfactants in soil. Environment Pollution 2011;159:809-16.

Rodrıguez–Cruz MS, Sanchez–Martin MJ, Sanchez–Camazano M. A comparative study of adsorption of anionic and anon-ionic surfactant by soils based on physicochemical and mineralogical properties of soils. Chemosphere 2005;61:56-64.

McKay G, Porte JF, Prasad GR. The removal of dye colors from aqueous solutions by desorption on low-cost materials. Water Air Soil Pollute 1999;114:423-38.

Liu Y, Juan Liu Y. Biosorption isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. Purify Technology 2008;61:229-42.

Jung Y, Chui J, Lee W. Spectroscopic investigation of magnetite surface for the reduction of hexavalent chromium. Chemosphere 2007;68:1968-75.

Yuan P, Fan M, Yang D, He H, Liu D, Yuan A, et al. Montmorillonite -supported magnetite nanoparticles for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. Journal of Hazardous Maeter 2009;166:821-9.

Zor S .Investigation of the adsorption of anionic surfactant at different pH values by means of active carbon and the kinetics of adsorption. Joural of Serb Chem Soc 2004;69:25-32.

Published

2015-12-28

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

How to Cite

Performance Evaluation of Adsorbent Leca- Modified (TiO2/LECA) for the Removal of Anionic Surfactants from Wastewater. (2015). Knowledge and Health in Basic Medical Sciences, 11(1), Page:41-48. https://doi.org/10.22100/jkh.v11i1.1093

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 > >>