Case Report: Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy with Placenta Accreta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22100/jkh.v17i4.2950Abstract
Introduction: Ectopic pregnancy is the most common cause of maternal mortality, while cesarean scar ectopic is one of the rarest of all ectopic pregnancies. Early diagnosis of this type of pregnancy leads to better control of this situation.
Methods: A 28-year-old 28 weeks’ pregnant woman (G3P1Ab1L1) presented to the emergency department with the complaint of hematuria, labor pain, bleeding, and cervical dilation. The patient was taken to the operating room, considering her past surgical history of cesarean delivery. Due to the recreated placenta and ectopic pregnancy, hysterectomy and Cystorrhaphy were performed.
Results: Cesarean scar ectopic is a type of extrauterine pregnancy that implants around the place of a previous pregnancy scar. This pregnancy may cause severe hemorrhage due to uterine rupture, accreta, and percreta placenta. Bladder invasion by the placenta percreta causes hematuria during pregnancy, so early diagnosis plays a critical role. Ultrasonography is a widely accessible method. As described in this case, a false negative result in ultrasonography causes extensive hemorrhage hysterectomy.
Conclusion: The ectopic pregnancy may occurs in the connective tissue around the site of a previous cesarean scar. This type of pregnancy can cause severe bleeding due to uterine rupture or placenta accreta and placental abruption. Placenta percarta invading the bladder causes hematuria during pregnancy and early diagnosis is very important and the most available diagnostic method is transvaginal ultrasound. A false negative diagnosis may lead to complications such as uncontrollable bleeding and hysterectomy as in this case.
References
Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2002;57:537-43. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200208000-00024
Ozen M, Birmingham E, Hoffman M, Raissi D. Non-surgical management of abdominal ectopic pregnancy with uterine artery embolization. Radiol Case Rep 2022;17:1631-3. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.02.040
Marchand GJ, Masoud AT, Coriell C, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, et al. Treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy in china with uterine artery embolization-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2022;11:7393. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247393
Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:1066-74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68397-9
Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Recent advances in the management of placenta previa. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004;16:447-51. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200412000-00002
Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Bardsley TR, Greene T, Varner MW, Silver RM. Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort. Am J Perinatol 2014;31:799-804. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1361833
Concatto NH, Westphalen SS, Vanceta R, Schuch A, Luersen GF, Ghezzi CLA. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in placenta accreta spectrum disorders: pictorial essay. Radiol Bras 2022;55:181-7. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0115
Klein J. Gynecologic surgery. In: Forrest Dell M, Peter M, editors. surgical critical care and emergency surgery clinical questions and answers. 3rd ed. Wiley online library 2022.p.481-91. doi: 10.1002/9781119756781.ch44
Vela G, Tulandi T. Cervical pregnancy: the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:481-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.11.012.
Sinha P, Mishra M. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a precursor of placenta percreta/accreta. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;32:621-3. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.698665
Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;16:592-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00300-2.x
Meng X, Xie L, Song W. Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2013;39:1958-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.05.017
Adabi K, Nekuie S, Rezaeei Z, Rahimi-Sharbaf F, Banifatemi S, Salimi S. Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy: systemic methotrexate followed by curettage. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;288:687-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2807-y
Lam H, Pun T, Lamb P. Successful conservative management of placenta previa accreta during cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;86:31-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.12.009
Ueno Y, Kitajima K, Kawakami F, Maeda T, Suenaga Y, Takahashi S, et al. Novel MRI finding for diagnosis of invasive placenta praevia: evaluation of findings for 65 patients using clinical and histopathological correlations. Eur Radiol 2014;24:881-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3076-7
Dabiri T, Marroquin GA, Bendek B, Agamasu E, Mikhail M. Advanced extrauterine pregnancy at 33 weeks with a healthy newborn. BioMed Res Int 2014;2014:102479. doi: 10.1155/2014/102479
Hobson SR, Kingdom JC, Murji A, Windrim RC, Carvalho JC, Singh SS, et al. No. 383-screening, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2019;41:1035-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.004
Rosen T. Placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy: overlooked costs of the rising cesarean section rate. Clinics in Perinatology 2008;35:519-29. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.07.003
Meyer M, Tonascia J. Maternal smoking, pregnancy complications, and perinatal mortality. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1977;128:494-502. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90031-x
Zaki ZS, Bahar A, Ali M, Albar HM, Gerais M. Risk factors and morbidity in patients with placenta previa accreta compared to placenta previa non-accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scandinavica 1998;77:391-4. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.1998.00015.x
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.