Virtual Patients in Undergraduate Surgery Education: A Randomized Controlled Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22100/jkh.v3i1.197Keywords:
Clinical clerkship, Computer-assisted instruction, Randomized controlled trials, User–computer interface.Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to clarify the effects of implementing a series of virtual patients in undergraduate surgery education on various dimensions of skills as applied to clinical problems.
Methods: In a randomized controlled trial 48 surgery clerks were assigned to an intervention group who worked on 14 simulated cases of abdominal pain during 7 weeks in a computer lab and a control group without access to software. At the end of the intervention, both groups were tested by a structured, seven-part paper-based exam evaluating certain areas of competence.
Results: In this study, from 48 medical students, forty-five students took the exam. Results showed a significant improvement in history taking (P < 0.001) and no improvement in scores related to appropriate use of radiology and lab tests, proposing differential diagnoses and management plans and factual knowledge. From the intervention group, 20 students completed a virtual case exam whose results had a poor correlation with the written exam.
Conclusion: Overall, our findings indicate that virtual patients are strong tools in enhancing history-taking skills of students, but they do not affect other areas of competence significantly. Educators are recommended to be sceptical about enthusiastic reports on various computer applications and avoid falling into false expectations of their implementation.
References
Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. Br Med J 2001; 322: 40–44.
Adler MD, Johnson KB. Quantifying the literature of computeraided instruction in medical education. Acad Med 2000; 75: 1025–8.
Bligh J. Problem-based learning in medicine: an introduction. Postgrad Med 1995; 71: 323–6.
Levine MG, Stempak J, Conyers G, Walters JA. Implementing and integrating computer-based activities into a problem-based gross anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat 1999; 12: 191–8.
Qayumi AK, Qayumi T. Computer-assisted learning: cyberpatient-a step in the future of surgical education. J Invest Surg 1999; 12: 307–17.
Bearman M, Cesnik B. Comparing student attitudes to different models of the same virtual patient. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 84(Pt 2):1004-8.
Lehmann CU, Nguyen B, Kim GR, Johnson KB, Lehmann HP. Restricted natural language processing for case simulation tools. Proc AMIA Symp 1999: 575–9.
Clark RE. When researchers swim upstream: reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educ Technol 1991; 31: 34–40.
Lynch TG, Steele DJ, Johnson Palensky JE, Lacy NL, Duffy SW. Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction. Am J Surg 2001; 181: 368–71.
Trochim W. The research methods knowledge base. 2nd ed. Cincinnati: Atomic dog publishing; 2000.
Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 2002; 77 Suppl 10: S86–S93.
Bryce DA, King NJ, Graebner CF, Myers JH. Evaluation of a diagnostic reasoning program (DxR): exploring student perceptions and addressing faculty concerns. J Interactive Media Educ 1998 [Cited 21 December 2005]. Available from: URL: www-jime. open.ac.uk/98/1.
Carr MM, Reznick RK, Brown DH. Comparison of computer–assisted instruction and seminar instruction to acquire psychomotor and cognitive knowledge of epistaxis management. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121: 430–34.
Lyon HC Jr, Healy JC, Bell JR, et al. Significant efficiency findings while controlling for the frequent confounders of CAI research in the PlanAlyzer project’s computer-based, self-paced, case-based programs in anemia and chest pain diagnosis. J Med Syst 1991; 15: 117–32.
Mehta MP, Sinha P, Kanwar K, Inman A, Albanese M, Fahl W. Evaluation of internet-based oncologic teaching for medical students. J Cancer Educ 1998; 13: 197–202.
Weverling GJ, Stam J, ten Cate TJ, van Crevel H. Computerassisted education in problem-solving in neurology; a randomized educational study. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1996; 140: 440–43.Dutch.
Minion DJ, Donnelly MB, Quick RC, Pulito A, Schwartz R. Are multiple objective measures of student performance necessary? Am J Surg 2002; 183: 663–5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
